Group Admins

  • Avatar Image
    David Langford
    President, Langford International, Inc.
  • Avatar Image
    Monta Akin
    Asst. Supt. for Instructional Services

Leading Learning Group

Public Group active 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Leadership for learning. Are you an education leader? This Leading Learning group is for school administrators at all levels. Superintendents, presidents, principals, deans, directors and future administrator/leaders are all welcome to post questions and documents. Get connected with deeper explanations and examples.

Optimization of a System (10 posts)

← Group Forum   Jump to Last Post   View Forums List
  • Avatar Image David Langford said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Doug Stilwell is Superintendent in Urbandale, IA. He recently addressed the Probletunity of weather related school closing. I will let Doug explain the process. I want to address the Profound Knowledge behind what Doug is attempting. The Taguchi Loss Function tells us that the further we move away from optimum the greater the loss. In this case, loses can be unknown and unknowable. How do we count the loses of parents not being notified on time and spending time and effort to get kids to school only to find that it is closed? How do we quantify the loses when weather causes an accident that could have been avoided with timely notification? Combining system thinking, psychology, statistical variation and knowledge works together to create optimization of a system. Doug can you explain the process?

    “Here is the loss function I did for weather related school closings. Please go ahead and post. You may certainly cite Urbandale as the school district.” – Doug Stilwell

  • Avatar Image Doug Stilwell said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    This year we purchased an automated communication system that allows our district to readily contact all or selected families by phone, email, or text message. With this technology available we have the opportunity to contact all families in the event of school cancellation due to snow/weather conditions. Before moving ahead with what I thought (without any data) was a great idea, I decided to get input from those most impacted: Families. It appeared that the “loss function” process would be the best way to get the input from families I desired, and to this end I created an electronic survey with one main question:

    Are you in favor of being notified by phone when school cancellation takes place due to snow/inclement weather?

    If the answer to this question was “no,” the survey ended. If the answer was yes, it led to three more questions (this is the loss function part of the survey), which I refer to as the “Goldilocks paradox:”
    What time would be too early to call?
    What time would be too late to call?
    What time would you prefer to be called?

    The possible choices to answer these three questions included:
    5:00 a.m.
    5:15 a.m.
    5:30 a.m.
    5:45 a.m.
    6:00 a.m.
    6:15 a.m.
    6:30 a.m.
    6:45 a.m.
    7:00 a.m.

    I received 683 responses. 88% were in favor of using this communication method and 12% were not in favor. The data clearly informed me to move ahead. The loss function process showed the least number of “losses” at 6:15 a.m., while the two most “popular” “best times to call” were 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 a.m.

    Since 6:15 a.m. had the least “losses” and since it was wedged in between the two most favorable times, the data has informed me the best time to make the automated call for school closures is 6:15 a.m. We will also communicate our school closing on our local media outlets and our website.

    The loss function process was extremely helpful in the decision making process, for the only other way I was going to make a decision (and I did consider this) was just to make my “best guess” using my “gut feeling.” I believe the outcome of the process has produced the best time to call and the decision can be defended to anyone based on the data that was collected.

  • Avatar Image David Langford said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Excellent Doug. Thank you. We also call it the Three Bears Method.

  • Avatar Image David Langford said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Try this exercise.

    Dr. Deming proposed a system of Profound Knowledge. I have modified it slightly to think about a system of Profound Learning consisting of four elements: learning, variation, systems and psychology. Create an Interrelationship Digraph and see if your results match my graph in the documents section: Profound Learning Interrelationship Digraph

    How does this level of understanding affect daily decision making and processes?

  • Avatar Image peter said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Hi. having applied Deming and others to schools as organisations, it seems sad that school leaders are hardly trained at all (at least in the UK) in leading a complex organisation like a school. Our training system is more like learning compliance to a centralised system that does not work! It is fortunate that so many school leaders are resiliant and gifted. For me I find the following inter-related and intertwining areas assumed or absent in UK schools (same as US?) but all are the secret of success and the release of creative talent. These are Systems Thinking itself. Customer Care in a very wide sense and Group Loyalty Psychology. it would take an age to explain how I got to this point but it is not far from the comments above. For me Vertical Tutoring is the only active organisational learning culture that makes a learning ‘system’ operationally supported and coherent from end to end.

  • Avatar Image David Langford said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Hello Peter,

    Glad you made it. Could you explain more about what you mean with Vertical Tutoring? That is not a common phrase in the United States.

    Perhaps you would like to open another forum for that topic, so people can focus in on it?

  • Avatar Image peter said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Hi David
    Please appreciate that I feel a little behind the curve here.
    When I look at the school as a system, everything and everybody tends to be organised horizontally, in years. Children arrive as members of already powerful loyalty groups that massively influence their ‘openess to learning and experience’ (home, the gang, the area, the class etc). Schools tend to accept and absorb these and add to the difficulties this often negative membership influence can pose through assumptions about school transfer, partnership and even teaching and learning (and so on). The school too often fails to successfully intervene to form more supportive and positive loyalty groups around students (I call these learning relationships eg tutor, parent child) because horizontal systems are far too rigid as systems. In fact, there is a danger of making things worse, something I have found in every one of the 200 schools that I have worked with to change their learning culture. To compensate, we invent pastoral support and counselling (a sort of student repair shop). In effect the system is the wrong way round in schools. We repair rather than prepare and support. We then end up with all the right people all in the right place and all doing the wrong job…in part. Vertical Tutoring is a front office system whereby the student base or tutor group or home group comprises all-age students who meet daily with their group tutor for (say) 25 minutes. The activities in that time tend to be learning related (support of and preparation for, learning) and conversational. Older students take on leadership roles. The school is organised with this vertical support system as the key driver for learning and for the whole school as an effective system. It is known in the US but not in the way i would advise (as far as I know). The tutor does NOT and Should NOT DELIVER PROGRAMMES in my book. The time is too important for that. This system also builds a critical partnership (learning relationship) with parents.

    Hope this helps!

  • Avatar Image peter said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    I have been looking at the US ‘systems’ from individual schools posted here. There are marked similarities with UK schools but US schools (such as Leander) seem to be trying (rightly) to both describe their operational management system and make it work. This is never easy. Too often I see values posing as targets and vv. Even so, I still believe our all too familiar system words sometimes get in the way of what is actually happening. For me it is not thinking outside of the box but realising the box we are in. I would love the opportunity of looking at a US High School close up and personal. I wonder, are they really the same as UK schools with too many underlying assumptions about how learning and support relationships work?

  • Avatar Image Michael King said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    Hi Peter.
    I am interested in your reflections on the UK educations system. We have similar problems here in Australia with an over emphasis on delivering programs rather than focussing on learning. We also tend to miss out on the benefit of systems thinking and social phychology – to which you refer. Deming’s SoPK really provides a guiding light – but we really do have to transform the exising system of management. This web site can help us build the critical mass.

  • Avatar Image David Langford said 1 year, 6 months ago:

    I have uploaded the Radar Chart Template of whole school assessment in the Data Management category of the documents section. Michael King has worked with many schools to create the same type of assessment. I have also created a video link in this section to the QLA website and Mary Asikas, Principal at Seaford 6-12 explains how the Radar Chart is used. I don’t yet know of a better way to show all your data sets on one graph. I think it is a fantastic tool for sharing with boards, staff, parents and students. Strengths and weaknesses become obvious. I have also uploaded a Radar Template Poster from QLA. The QLA link is also in the Links section.
    Keep moving forward,
    David